Really struggling to make a decision on whether to choose engineered wood or tiles on top of underfloor heating, water option. What are the key pros and construction? Thanks
Hi John, I've recently had underfloor heating fitted and it works really well. The advice I was given was that wet UF is more expensive to install but cheaper to run and dry UF is cheaper to install but more expensive to run. I had it fitted in a new extension that is now my kitchen diner, so because it was ground floor I chose wet UF and have fitted porcelain tiles over it. Wood looks beautiful but I have 3 dogs so tiles are more practical. Also it's possible that wood as a living entity could warp and shift with the changes in temperature.
I have porcelain tiles and engineered wood over wet UFH. The main difference I notice is that the tiles conduct the heat better and seem to retain the heat for longer. I think it depends which room you are installing the flooring in. My tiles are in the kitchen/dining/casual living area which I spend a lot of time in. The engineered wooden floor is in the hallway and it doesn't matter if it doesn't heat up quite as well.
Istoria by Jordan Andrews
Woodpecker Flooring
Related Discussions
1940's NZ kitchen - small, awkward-ish layout.
Q
help with kitchen floor remodelling
Q
Choosing Heating
Q
Shower door for double shower - What to do?
Q
Clifton Stone
yvonne1958
Helen C