camdenandrews01

Thinking outside the square: Energy efficient – but at what cost?

Hardie and Thomson Northland
8 years ago
last modified: 6 years ago


In the established hierarchy of values of the building industry, energy efficiency is the primary measure. While energy efficiency is, without question, an important component of sustainability, it should not be used to establish pathways for less than desirable materials. EPS based insulation is one example of a product entering construction on the back of energy efficiency. The consumer is led to believe the product is the way of the future, when in fact it’s a very nasty chemical cocktail with no sustainable waste management plans, little to no connection to recycling exists. It is understandable how this has happened – energy efficiency is the most visible, attainable and quantifiable measure of success. However, we feel we are at a crossroads where a reassessment of this value structure is called for. Is an energy efficient home that does not sincerely account for the environmental impact or long-term health effects of its residents truly sustainable? Would you choose energy efficiency currently, even if it could be detrimental down the track? Does energy efficiency matter to you?

Comments (5)